Score: 4

"What in the God's name..?"

submission: Microwave Man

date: January 8, 2006

What in earth was that? Some random techno music and a guy with a microwave oven for his head with a baseball bat chasing a chicken, plus a background with a toilet and poo. I mean, come on!!

Well, at least the preloader is great. I really LOVE the way the preloader looks. Sadly, I cannot rate the preloader itself.

Star520: SECONDS to blam. All my zero is belong to this.

Score: 9

"Not so much used concept, but still old"

submission: Menorah Madness

date: January 2, 2006

Interesting version, though.

I was just caught by the scene what you get when you lose... The guy laughed without smiling... It makes it... apathetic, phlegmatic... ..you know?

Score: 9

"Hmmm...."

submission: Alien Pong

date: December 11, 2005

Better than average Pong remakes. Some pickups and stuff like that would make it sweet.

Though it's too easy to cheat. Just try to keep your mouse cursor over the "ball", and your paddle will always be on the right spot. You should hide the mouse cursor.

And MegaMightyMe: It's not impossible. You just suck at it. The speed of the ball increases by every hit, and after it's too fast to the enemy, he'll miss it.

Score: 7

"It was okay."

submission: The Night Santa went mad!

date: December 11, 2005

But I can't believe you don't know that Santa doesn't live in the North Pole but in Lapland!! Exactly how many reindeer have you seen in the North Pole? But people in Lapland live for reindeer!

Anyways, it was okay. You should just quit the fat paintbrush and move to solid lines. Paintbrush makes it all... messy.

Score: 8

"Okay.... hmm..."

submission: Letter effects 2

date: December 9, 2005

You are inspirated and original. Or very, very, very extremely bored. Or both.

Eitherway, good but pointless.

Score: 6

"Nah."

submission: Create A City!

date: December 9, 2005

You should've made the pieces snap to an (invisible) grid, so it wouldn't be a total pixelwork trying to get the stuff on their own places. Also a bigger variety of buildings with more detail would've been appropriate. Nice idea, give it a new shot. This one missed.

Score: 9

"Weird and hard..."

submission: Arnold Ski SUMday

date: December 8, 2005

...but good. Keep it up, I want moooorrrrreee!!

Score: 7

"Hmm...."

submission: 'The Last Present'

date: December 8, 2005

It took forever to watch when compared to the actual content. It also needs some music. But besides of that, viewable. The mistletoe-thingy was weird tho, because the PLAY-button had been already pushed.

Score: 7

"Oh well."

submission: T tree tutorial

date: October 27, 2005

This steps on the same foot that Gamecubicle's mighty cover-it-all tutorial, Ultimate Tutorial 1 and 2: lots and lots and even more spelling mistakes. Also tons of info squeezed into one phrase is too much. You should also tell people what everything in the code does. Not just tell them "copy this into this and that into that and you're done!", because that doesn't really tell the n00bie what to do and really doesn't help him to understand and not to mention, remember how to do stuff like this in the future without always consulting some tutorial.

Whew! This is the longest review I've ever done. In conclusion: music was mediocre and the explanations didn't almost exist. Still a tutorial to take seriously.

Score: 8

"Too easy."

submission: Defend Your Inglor

date: October 23, 2005

I got the whole game through with only one hit, and didn't even sweat. It's too easy. Good games have at least one almost impossible level, so there's something to compete about. Getting through it. The music started to bore after the 6th listening round. Also the bad quality shot sounds from like 1980 annoyed too. Anyways, a good concept still with some smoothening to do.